// you’re reading...

Asides

Fraud? – Judge shields Hillary Clinton till after November

Judge Munoz Saves Hillary’s Presidential Bid In LA Court Action

 

In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!

While Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Barabara Streisand, Cher, Stan Lee, Brad Pitt, Mike Wallace, Larry King et al may be called to testify and be deposed starting in May, Hillary alone has been protected from explaining her role in her husband’s fraud charges.

In an astonishing ruling by the Judge, Hillary Clinton may NOT be deposed about her role in the illegal solicitation and cover up of the largest contribution made to her Senate campaign until after the presidential election. This is the same contribution Hillary denied knowing about or receiving when Lloyd Grove of the Washington Post asked her specifically about it and her relationship with the donor, Peter Paul, in August 2000. Its the same contribution her finance director David Rosen was criminally tried in May, 2005, or hiding from her and her campaign. Its the same contribution the FEC fined her campaign for hiding from the voters in three false FEC reports by her treasurer between 2000-2006. (www.paulvclinton.com)

Equally surprising as the ruling was the judge’s request to Hillary defense lawyer David Kendall to “say hello to his ( Judge Munoz”) friend Bill, also a partner in Kendall’s law firm”
The decision to shield Hillary Clinton from civil discovery for an additional seven months, thereby delaying a long postponed trial, was made by the judge on his own, without any request by Hillary or her lawyer to make the ruling. No discussion was permitted by Paul’s lawyer before the decision was made. Judge Munoz’ unilateral decision effectively saved the floundering campaign and hopes of Hillary Clinton to win her party’s Presidential nomination!  Link to full article

Link to LA Superior Court Case Summary BC 304174
Peter F Paul Vs William Jefferson Clinton

Peter F Paul video record of Clintons:  Hillary Uncensored – 13 mins

http://video.google.com:80/videoplay?docid=7007109937779036019&pr=goog-sl

Discussion

Comments are disallowed for this post.

  1. I wonder if this will blow up or be quickly filed under “no one needs to know about this right now” in the Clinton library. Wouldn’t it be great if BOTH Clintons had impeachment trials while president? I can’t see American’s standing for this while somebody is president. If I were advising her, I would tell her to get it out of the way now before she creates an unneeded media frenzy when she’s president, yet again distracting us all from the important issues.

    Obama’s not perfect, but at least he’s not a felon.

    Posted by Zac | April 28, 2008, 9:58 am
  2. My country SCARES ME!!!! I can not believe the judge ruled in the manner, talk about obstruction of justice!!!!!

    Perhaps groups in every major US city should stage protests, revealing information on this outrage… Or would the media just “overlook” this too?

    Posted by BryAnn B | April 28, 2008, 11:14 am